A SECRET WEAPON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXECUTIVE AND NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS CASE LAWS

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

III)     During the Edition in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to your petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

The main target is within the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major challenge: a particularly minimal threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

4.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of sooner or later inside the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged prevalence as well as prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to get the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't respond in any respect to the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak kind of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners alongside one another on a motorcycle at four.

12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that click here the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to try and do away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.

This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]

Some pluralist systems, for instance Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, will not specifically healthy into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may have been intensely influenced via the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted within the civil law tradition.

Typically, only an appeal accepted through the court of last vacation resort will resolve this kind of differences and, for many reasons, this kind of appeals are often not granted.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are topic to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion might be regarded as, however, we have been clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, matter to availability of vacancy subject matter to the approval in the competent authority.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment may rely upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]

ten. Without touching the merits from the case in the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to become made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Seek out websites affiliated with highly regarded legal institutions or organizations. Confirm the information against other sources when achievable.

competent authority has determined the eligibility in the private respondents and found them to generally be match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page